Skip to main content

Boltzmann brains--randomly self-generating intelligences


A “Boltzmann brain” is the name for an intelligence that would randomly generate itself out of nothing. In some cosmological theories, believe it or not, the number of Boltzmann brains are thought to outnumber every human being who has ever lived or will ever live. By a long shot. Please allow me to explain this odd concept I just learned about a few days ago.

Boltzmann was an Austrian physicist, best known for the development of statistical mechanics, who proposed that the entire universe could have randomly generated itself out of nothing, even though that would be a highly improbable occurrence (to say the least). However, if the universe is thought to have existed forever, sooner or later it would have happened, was his reasoning--because even if the odds against something happening are one in one trillion or lower, given infinite time, even something unbelievably unlikely will eventually happen. Eventually--as in a trillion trillion trillion trillion years perhaps. This idea that the cosmos we know could spontaneously arise from random matter floating around in an eternal universe was based on his statistical understanding of random motion of matter and embraced the concept that matter instantly self-assembling itself in a complex form is not impossible…just highly highly highly improbable (again, to say the least). Modern cosmologists who apply Boltzmann's principle speak of quantum flux--that the vacuum of space randomly produces particles and antiparticles that usually vanish into nothing before they are even perceived to exist...usually. But in a very highly unlikely scenario, such particles could stick around and self assemble into complex forms.

Boltzmann developed this theory before the Big Bang was the commonly-accepted theory of how the universe came to be. Before the development of the Big Bang concept, the simplest way to explain how the universe could have come into existence was to imagine it had always existed in some form. Which lead to Boltzmann’s thought concerning our current cosmos, which has relatively low entropy and thus is highly mathematically improbable, but that given infinite time, this improbability really poses no problem. Sooner or later, our stars, planets, galaxies, and all else that exists would self-create based on random chance only, given enough time, instantly popping into existence in the form everything currently holds.

Or course, the Big Bang theory, after Boltzmann's time, puts a time limit on the universe…and the currently-accepted figure of 14 billion years is not nearly enough for a universe creating itself out of nothing, fully developed, to actually happen (if such a thing could ever happen at all)…

The concept of the Boltzmann brain came about when someone noticed that if we’re talking about things randomly generating themselves, wouldn’t it be easier to imagine a mind would generate itself randomly with a complete set of false memories and this mind would simply imagine there is an entire universe, as opposed to the entire universe self-generating? Because a single mind spontaneously generating itself, even with false memories, is more probable than an entire complete cosmos creating itself out of nothing. Which, in terms of probability, is certainly true.

This thinking, even though based on mathematical probability, crosses quickly into philosophical speculation as I see it. If a mind can be postulated to instantly generate itself with false memories and no prior cause, how can anyone know at this very moment that you are not a Boltzmann brain, floating somewhere in a universe that is otherwise totally empty, simply imagining everything else that exists, including your own five senses, your past history, and your interactions with other people? On a certain level it strikes me that you don’t know and you can’t know…once confronted with an idea like this, if you take Boltzmann’s well-established concept of probability and how it's been applied seriously and what that implies for self-generating minds, then that means that believing there is such a thing as a material world outside of yourself involves at least a little bit of an act of faith.

It turns out Boltzmann’s concept proves to deliver some highly inconvenient mathematics. Because in certain views of the cosmos, ones that see the universe approaching infinity in any way at all in terms of time (and space), it’s actually thought to be likely that there are Boltzmann brains self generating at a rate that eventually would cause them to infinitely outnumber all of humanity. Cosmologists know this sounds rather insane, as the linked NY Times article discusses. They know it sounds insane, but according to what I’ve read on the topic, they also know the math is valid…so they think this is a sign there is something wrong with the math, something they need to fix. (“No duh,” some of my readers are probably saying. For me, the solution to this problem is simple--the universe we inhabit is not infinite in time. It has not always existed and will not always exist in the future).

As a Christian writer deeply interested in both science and the supernatural, I see a lot of potential stories in the Boltzmann brain concept. Why couldn’t a story suggest that God is the original Boltzmann brain? Who instantly came into existence and then through a process not yet understood, brought about everything else? Perhaps by everything we know being a product of His imagination? I don’t believe at all that God is a Boltzmann brain, but it’s an interesting notion that puts a new twist on the idea of God’s existence and would be an interesting backdrop for a science fiction tale with a religious flair. And it’s certainly hard to argue from a materialistic point of view that this isn’t possible. From a strictly materialistic point of view, it most certainly is possible, assuming a universe that exists for an infinitely long time…

I know for many of my Christian friends, the subject of God as a Boltzmann brain would be taboo, but what about other uses? What if angels and demons, whose creation is never explained in the Bible, simply self-generated randomly in a universe that would allow that? God would be responsible for the universe that allowed that spontaneous generation, of course…but wouldn’t that potentially change the nature of Lucifer’s rebellion? If he’d never been directly created by God? Just maybe, anyway?

Or more simply, why shouldn’t interstellar exploration stories include some random intelligences existing in deep space? Instead of assuming non-corporeal intelligences to have evolved to a “higher plane” from planet-bound life forms as Star Trek did a number of times (particularly in the first movie), the minds in the stories I would recommend writing would prove to have come about fully formed, in a mathematically explicable process that had nothing at all to do with evolution…

ttp

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

  2. Radina IvanovaJune 16, 2016 at 6:29 AM
    I'm currently reading on the topic of Bolztmann brains and their possible existence. I found your article to be quite good in the way that you are raising more questions, rather than simply disregarding the theory.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Ways to Deal with the Problem Magic Poses Christian Fantasy Writers

First off, what is the problem with magic for Christians? Or sorcery? Or witchcraft? (Are all of those things even the same?) An entire book could be written on this topic (perhaps I'll do that someday) but to keep this as brief as possible, the short reason this is a problem is the Bible has nothing good to say about the practice of magic (neither does extra-Biblical Christian tradition). No translation of Scripture will record the 12 Disciples watching Jesus walk on the water and say, "Wow, that was magical!" Nor is the mana falling from heaven in Israel's wilderness wanderings described as some kind of powerful spell that Moses used, nor even is his rod described as "magic," even though Moses had the power granted to him by God to turn it into a serpent at whatever time he chose. No, the Bible describes events like these as "miracles," or "signs," or "wonders." On the other hand, when the Bible talks about "mag

Peter Jackson's Ring of Power

As Gandalf famously stated in the Fellowship of the Ring, the Ring of Power appealed to the good-hearted and heroic wizard, giving him a desire to use it for good. But in fact, as every LOTR fan knows, it   cannot   be done. The Ring of Power will eventually corrupt every person who attempts to use it into an evil being. Watching the Fellowship of the Ring movie last night reminded me of this principle. The fact that evil   cannot  be used for good is one of the things I love most about The Lord of the Rings. It’s a powerful statement about the attempt human beings make over and over again to gain power supposedly for good—which simply cannot be done by evil means. Not without   becoming   evil. By the way, back when it was first released, I strenuously objected to the plot changes Peter Jackson put into the Fellowship of the Ring. No, for me, the original story was quite good enough and didn’t need to be streamlined or “Hollywoodized” or anything of the sort. When Frodo s

Nanite Infested Aliens

Inspired by the history of Europeans coming to the New World carrying bacteria to which the native inhabitants had little to no immunity, I thought: "What if aliens visiting Earth carried their own sort of infection or infestation, to which we humans had no immunity?" Sort of a War of the Worlds scenario in reverse... But I'm sure that sort of thing has already been done by someone, aliens carrying virulent disease(s) humans don't carry. So what if the infestation were of nanites--what  if nanites become a standard part of healthcare for any advanced technological species? (Just as hand washing and sterilization of medical instruments become standard at a certain point of development--once bacteria are discovered and found to be potentially harmful.) So that nanites are literally crawling all over (and inside) the bodies of high-tech aliens (or perhaps time travelers from Earth's distant future). What if these nanites potentially posed a risk to the human race?